<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T: Support and Naked DSL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/</link>
	<description>lukebaker.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/comment-page-1/#comment-10931</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/#comment-10931</guid>
		<description>This phone number is for the midwest. Texas residents should call 888-387-6270. Same hours apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This phone number is for the midwest. Texas residents should call 888-387-6270. Same hours apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz K.</title>
		<link>http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/comment-page-1/#comment-8853</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/#comment-8853</guid>
		<description>If you want to be an early adopter of this, be ready for some pains b/c AT&amp;T is making it miserable for me to transfer. But we need enough early adopters to tell AT&amp;T to screw off and unbundle their services...

I live in San Francisco and had AT&amp;T High Speed, placed the order on 12/24/07 for $23.99 dry loop service. What a joke. They screwed up my order and so didn&#039;t place it (after telling me it&#039;d take two business days to get done). The originally scheduled downtime happened (on 12/31) but the uptime sure hasn&#039;t yet. It was planned for 1/2 but on 1/3 I checked and found out that the &quot;order hadn&#039;t been placed&quot;. WTF?

Currently no department wants to take responsibility to get this done, even though someone there screwed up the order.

They first told me it&#039;d take 2 business days, now they&#039;re saying 5 biz days from the date of the &quot;fixed&quot; order and that &quot;Dry Loop cases don&#039;t have escalations because they are not a priority.&quot; (I&#039;m appalled that they can say this with a regretful tone - it&#039;s condescending)

Customer service reps are sweet but ineffective - if AT&amp;T wants to keep its techier clients they need to get with the times. This is 2008 and Silicon Valley - play nice before the Google gets in on your turf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to be an early adopter of this, be ready for some pains b/c AT&amp;T is making it miserable for me to transfer. But we need enough early adopters to tell AT&amp;T to screw off and unbundle their services&#8230;</p>
<p>I live in San Francisco and had AT&amp;T High Speed, placed the order on 12/24/07 for $23.99 dry loop service. What a joke. They screwed up my order and so didn&#8217;t place it (after telling me it&#8217;d take two business days to get done). The originally scheduled downtime happened (on 12/31) but the uptime sure hasn&#8217;t yet. It was planned for 1/2 but on 1/3 I checked and found out that the &#8220;order hadn&#8217;t been placed&#8221;. WTF?</p>
<p>Currently no department wants to take responsibility to get this done, even though someone there screwed up the order.</p>
<p>They first told me it&#8217;d take 2 business days, now they&#8217;re saying 5 biz days from the date of the &#8220;fixed&#8221; order and that &#8220;Dry Loop cases don&#8217;t have escalations because they are not a priority.&#8221; (I&#8217;m appalled that they can say this with a regretful tone &#8211; it&#8217;s condescending)</p>
<p>Customer service reps are sweet but ineffective &#8211; if AT&amp;T wants to keep its techier clients they need to get with the times. This is 2008 and Silicon Valley &#8211; play nice before the Google gets in on your turf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/comment-page-1/#comment-5257</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/#comment-5257</guid>
		<description>If you tell them that Cable is at higher speeds for the same price they will change the package prices to $5 over standard DSL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you tell them that Cable is at higher speeds for the same price they will change the package prices to $5 over standard DSL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Boonstra</title>
		<link>http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/comment-page-1/#comment-3493</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Boonstra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukebaker.org/archives/2007/03/09/att-support-and-naked-dsl/#comment-3493</guid>
		<description>You were the 8th site when I googled &quot;dry loop dsl att&quot; but the most helpful.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were the 8th site when I googled &#8220;dry loop dsl att&#8221; but the most helpful.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.218 seconds -->

